The Third Option Nobody Wants(1 min read)

Written by

in

This is post 3 of 7 in the series “Pricing Games”

The best games on pricing: consumer classics, B2B innovations, and the psychology underneath. One short post every Wednesday.

  1. The $4.99 Chicken That Isn’t About Chicken
  2. Why $39 Beats $34
  3. The Third Option Nobody Wants(1 min read)
  4. Free Cake Forever vs. Two Weeks of the Full Cake Scheduled for November 4, 2026
  5. The 30% Toll Booth Scheduled for November 11, 2026
  6. Pay Only When It Works Scheduled for November 18, 2026
  7. Your Brain Has a Price Tag Too Scheduled for November 25, 2026

Dan Ariely ran a famous experiment with 100 business students. He offered three subscriptions to The Economist:

Web only: $59. Print only: $125. Print plus web: $125.

16 picked web. Zero picked print-only. 84 picked print plus web.

Then he removed the print-only option nobody wanted. Now it was $59 web versus $125 print plus web. Result: 68 picked web, 32 picked the bundle.

Nothing about the two real options changed. But adding a third option nobody buys flipped the winner.

That is the decoy effect. We do not judge prices on their own — we compare. Print-only at $125 made print-plus-web at $125 look like a steal. Take the decoy away, and suddenly $59 looks like the smart buy.

One honest note: this was a classroom demo, not a lab trial. But the underlying effect is peer-reviewed and real, and marketers use it every single day. Look at any “good / better / best” pricing page. The middle option is the one they want you to buy. The expensive one is the decoy that makes it look reasonable.

We think we choose with logic. Mostly, we choose by comparison.